Friday, June 18, 2010

The Truth Shall Set You Free

***Disclaimer: this post is not written by Will Willimon.

I recently received my Olan Mills' 8 x 10 portrait photograph in the mail this week from our North Alabama Annual Conference clergy pictorial directory. As I looked at the portrait in disbelief, I showed it to my wife and said: "I don't look like this!" I realized on that day that I have an entirely different mental picture of myself. This mental picture is not based upon how I look right now; it is based on what I looked like six years ago. It is the Facebook affect. We would rather not put the true pictures of ourselves out in social media, and so we post pictures from 2, 5 or 10 years ago.

I love the lyrics to the song, "You Can Do Better Than Me," by Death Cab for Cutie: "I've been slipping through the years. My old clothes don't fit like they once did. So they hang like ghosts of the people I have been."

It's hard to look at a realistic picture of who you truly are. My church is currently going through a ministry assessment and long range plan development as we look ahead to the year 2020. We began looking at the worship attendance for the contemporary worship service I regularly preach and we realized that the attendance spiked in 2004 and 2005. No one realized that this had happened. We thought we were still doing that well. The numbers told us the truth about ourselves. We needed to change the things we are doing that we shouldn't be doing and we should do the things we are not doing in order to help the service return to its upward trajectory. We also have to be honest that this service may not be the answer for many people and a fourth style of worship may be needed in our congregation.

There has been a lot of buzz online about numbers and clergy effectiveness due to Bishop Willimon's post and recent news about guaranteed appointments. It seems as though tension is rising in our denomination. We know that we need to turn the ship -- to help the United Methodist Church return to being a movement of transformed people rather than a connection of loyalists sustaining a structure. However, it seems as though whenever a suggestion is made to help us transition towards growth it is criticized and shot down. I am starting to feel that we are becoming less like the church in Acts, which prayed things out together, and more like a church that resembles our current political landscape where we shout at each other and ignore the core problems. Just like many meetings in the church, we think that talking about it is actually doing something about it.

And if you think about it, being evaluated by attendance seems so corporate. It seems as though members and visitors are becoming "customers." We rightly point to the fact that quality is just as important as quantity. But if we are honest, we are most likely celebrating other numbers in our denomination and in our local churches: we count the number of flood buckets sent to Nashville; we count the number of folks that are engaged in mission; and we count the offering which goes to support our buildings and ministry and mission. We care about numbers to an extent, but then there is that invisible line where it just doesn't feel "Methodist" to count those numbers.

So what does that say about us? Are numbers really the problem or is it the accountability that follows that makes us queasy? My guess is that some do not trust the powers that be with making the right decisions with the reported numbers. If that is the case, we do have means by which to hold cabinets accountable within the Discipline. However, might it also be true that we do not want to know the truth about our own churches and our own ministries? The truth is sometimes excruciating, but at least it has the potential for transformation.

Numbers are not the product or the fruit. They are merely a means by which to access the health of missions and ministry. People matter. So the goal is not simply better numbers but healthier churches reaching more people - making them into disciples. May the numbers be a means of grace and a challenge to minister more fervently!

Mike Holly
Canterbury UMC


ray said...

Sometimes I think the UMC trys to hard to "make" things happen,rather than seeking God and allowing things to happen.Its almost like a control issue.This is not working lets try this, oh what about this this might work.Just let God be God maybe its time for a pruning.Death cab for cutie REALLY!

ray said...

Maybe an example would be a salesperson thats trained with a sales system.a time tested,proven effective for decades system.When these salespeople fail more often than not they do not trust the system.I look at it this way God is the CEO and the Bible is the training manual.Does the UMC trust the system?

ray said...

DO YOU TRUST THE SYSTEM ? Every UMC clergy and lay leader should first ask this question to themself then to the those in the pews.You will probably get some yes buts,but its not a hard question.

bham billy said...

"a movement of transformed people rather than a connection of loyalists sustaining a structure" I think this is an accurate evaluation of where we are at and where we need to be. Hope we can get there. Good post Mike.

Philip said...

The terms movement and structure seem to be mutally exclusive to me. We are, in many ways, trying to keep the United Methodist hierarchical structure intact, but is this effort relevant to the a movement in the spirit of the teachings which supposedly inform our faith?

Maybe we're counting numbers because we think if we can just increase those numbers, it means we get to be relevant. But I don't think this is true. After all, a bad movie can still attract a huge audience if it's what they want, but what Jesus calls us to do and say isn't always (perhaps ever?) popular with the masses.

I think a statistic such as "number of people served per congregant" is a much better number for indicating our "health" than church attendance, but this is not my point.

My point is that we want to maintain a Structure of United Methodism, while at the same time re-lighting the Methodist movement, and I am not convinced this is possible. We have to ask if the structure is there to help us become better servants and disciples, or keep people's salaries paid. If it's the latter, we've got some very difficult decisions to make, and I hope we can be faithful in them.